SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 16461 / March 2, 2000
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Douglas W. Colt,
1:00CV00423 (D.C.D.C.) (EGS) (filed March 2, 2000)
SEC Sues Washington, D.C. Area Law Student
for Internet Price
Manipulation Scheme
On March 2, 2000, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil
injunctive action in the United States District Court for the District of
Columbia, alleging that Douglas Colt, a Washington, D.C. area law student,
created the "Fast-Trades.com" website which he used to manipulate the
price of four stocks during February and March 1999. According to the
complaint, through a scheme centered on recommending stocks on his
website, Colt drove up the short-term price for each stock by as much as
700%. By trading in advance of his stock recommendations, Colt generated
over $345,000 in total profits for himself, his mother Joanne Colt, three
of his law school classmates, and two of his friends. At times, their
profits exceeded 500% within an hour of the recommendation. Within a few
hours after the recommendations were disseminated to Fast-Trades
subscribers, the stock price decreased significantly from its intraday
high.
The Complaint alleges that Colt targeted low priced, thinly traded
stocks knowing that his trades and subscriber activity would artificially
increase the price of the stocks selected. For each of the four stocks
selected, Colt and the other participants in the scheme collectively
purchased a significant volume of the selected stock – in three cases more
than 150% of the total average daily volume. For all four stock
selections, Fast-Trades purchases were made shortly before the website
disseminated its recommendations to its subscribers.
The Complaint further alleges that after making these purchases and
before the recommendations to purchase the stock were e-mailed to the
subscribers, Colt and the other participants entered sell limit orders or
had orders entered on their behalf. Colt expected that unwitting
subscribers would buy the recommended stock. Colt further expected that
the purchases would drive the price higher still, triggering the sell
limit orders. This is precisely what happened.
According to the Complaint, subscriber purchases were essential to the
scheme. Thus, the participants needed to maintain and expand Fast-Trades'
subscriber rolls. To attract new subscribers, Colt and his three law
school classmates – Kenneth Terrell, Jason Wyckoff and Adam Altman –
promoted the website by collectively posting hundreds of false messages to
various internet message boards. These messages disguised the authors'
connection with the site and misrepresented the investment success they
achieved from following Fast-Trades' recommendations. Partly through these
postings, the subscriber base grew to more than 9,000 people over a two
month period.
In addition, the Complaint alleges that Colt posted a false "track
record" on the Fast-Trades website touting the performance of several
stocks he falsely claimed were Fast-Trades selections, and that the
website contained a misleading disclaimer crafted by Colt, Terrell,
Wyckoff and Altman that misrepresented their trading intentions to their
subscribers. The disclaimer stated that Colt and the Fast-Trades
representatives "may" trade Fast-Trades selections "at any time." In fact,
for each of the four stocks, Colt had already purchased the selected stock
and entered sell limit orders before Fast-Trades even distributed
the selection to its subscribers.
The Commission's Complaint seeks to permanently restrain and enjoin
Colt from violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities
laws, specifically Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and seeks civil
monetary penalties. The Complaint also seeks disgorgement of all illicit
profits from the manipulative scheme alleged in the Complaint, with
prejudgment interest.
Simultaneous with the filing of the Complaint, Colt consented, without
admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint, to the entry of a
final judgment permanently enjoining him from his violative conduct. Based
on his demonstrated financial inability to pay, the Commission waived
payment of disgorgement and prejudgment interest and did not seek the
imposition of a civil monetary penalty. Also simultaneous with the filing
of the Complaint, the Commission entered an administrative order related
to the conduct described in the Complaint. Without admitting or denying
the Commission's findings, Kenneth Terrell, Jason Wyckoff, Adam Altman and
Joanne Colt consented to an Order directing them to cease and desist from
committing or causing any violation and any future violation of Section
10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and ordering Terrell,
Wyckoff and Joanne Colt to pay disgorgement of all illicit profits with
prejudgment interest. See In the Matter of Kenneth Terrell, Jason
Wyckoff, Adam Altman and Joanne Colt, Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 42483 (March 2, 2000). Based on Terrell's, Wyckoff's and Joanne Colt's
demonstrated financial inability to pay, the Commission waived payment of
disgorgement and prejudgment interest.
Additional Materials Available on This Topic
Complaint ,
SEC v. Douglas W. Colt
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr16461.htm
