|
 
| |
| Accredited Investors, January 1999 |
January 10, 1999
Ms. Cathy Dixon
Chief Counsel
Division of Corporation Finance
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Mail Stop 3-3
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
REF: Our telephone conversations on November 3 & 16/ December 8: Accredited
Investors
Dear Ms. Dixon:
With our No-Action request dated July 23, 1997, we state under FACTUAL
BACKGROUND, paragraph 2: "The qualified investors [the intended viewing
audience] will be typical of the investors who would customarily be invited
to attend a live roadshow, such as a registered broker/dealer and investment
advisors." While NO one has taken "investors who would customarily be
invited to attend the live roadshow" to include average retail investors, as
I mentioned in our telephone conversation, there has been some confusion
over where we draw the line. Some investment banks customarily invite
certain high net worth individuals to attend the live roadshow. Almost all
investment banks invite small money managers (hoping that they will someday
become a large money manager) to attend. A small money manager may control
less money than the high net worth investor.
As we discussed on the telephone, what is needed is clear recognizable line
that should work within all situations and offer the underwriter, issuer,
NetRoadshow and of course the investor a definable standard. Per our
request, and with the understanding that the SEC will not recommend
enforcement action, we will now set it at the Regulation D standards for
'accredited investor.'
The underwriter, in turn, will be responsible for insuring that the viewer
meets the 'accredited investor' standard using the same approach as they
used today, before providing a password for a roadshow. The particular
'accredited investor' that selects to view the Internet roadshow would, in
keeping with the July 23, 1997 No-Action letter, be provided the opportunity
to attend a particular 'live' roadshow as determined exclusively by the
underwriter(s). In other words, no qualified investor would be
disadvantaged; all qualified investors would be treated equally.
Everything else about the Internet roadshow process will be consistent with
the No- Action request dated July 23, 1997. In all cases a password will be
required to view the material, and NetRoadshow provides, as part of our
service, a daily list of the clients that viewed the roadshow.
As you know, the intent of my request, which may be considered a
clarification of the No-Action letter, is to provide some definable
boundaries around a system that is already working well. Thank you for not
objecting to our request to include the Regulation D 'accredited investor'
as part of the Internet roadshow audience.
Should you have any questions, or additional thoughts, please do not
hesitate to contact me at (404) 873-0200.
Sincerely,
Brad Hammond
President
|
|