Home

Law Course Securities Law & the Internet

Law Course Advanced Securities Regulation

About

Disclaimer

Course Current Events

"Advanced Securities Regulation"

 

 

Please note:  Below are articles that I believe may be of interest.  I make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in these articles.  Further, their inclusion in my site does not, in any way, shape or form,  imply my sponsorship, endorsement, or approval of their content.   For more information, please read my general disclaimer

 

(Sometimes Required)

bullet

January 16th

bullet

No Assignment

bullet

January 23rd

bullet

"Outsider" Trading

bullet

(N.B. This is an unusually long assignment for current events -- you need not read it all -- you can just review the two litigation releases and Then skim the Decision (which I realize is still a lot to read)

bullet

LR-19450

Complaint

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lohmus Haavel & Viisemann, et al.(S.D.N.Y. 2005)

bullet

LR-20349

Complaint

Decision Granting Motion to Dismiss (1/9/2008)

SEC Appellate Brief I

SEC Appellate Brief II

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dorozhko (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

 

bullet

January 30th

bullet

Wall Street Journal, "Stoneridge and the Rule of Law,"  by Commissioner Paul Atkins (January 25, 2008)

bullet

Wall Street Journal Editorial:  A Win For Investors (January 16, 2008)

bullet

Bloomberg News Commentary:  Investors Lose Again Thanks to the Supreme Court by Susan Antilla (January 18, 2008)

bullet

Optional (Not at all required, just for reference if you are curious!)

bullet

Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. et al, No 06-43, Slip op. (U.S. January 15, 2008) 

bullet

February 6th

bullet

"Insider Trading Study Points Regulators to Wall Street," by Bailey Somers, Securities Law 360 (February 4, 2008)

bullet

February 13th

bullet

33-8892

Press Release

In the Matter of Kenneth M. Christison, Esq. (SEC order finding attorney caused an unlawful distribution of securities in multimillion dollar pump-and-dump scheme)

bullet
Optional and Not Required:  Speech by SEC Commissioner: Remarks at SEC Speaks by Commissioner Paul S. Atkins U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. February 8, 2008
bullet

February 20th

bullet

No Class (Faculty Retreat)

bullet

February  27th

bullet

No Assignment

bullet

March 5th

bullet

No Class (Spring Break)

bullet

Optional and Not Required: In the Matter of Allied Capital Corporation (June, 2007) (company failed to preserve documents to support how it valued investments)

bullet

March 12th

bullet

Spitzer Resignation 

bullet

 March 19th

bullet

No Current Events Assignment

bullet

Today's Privacy PowerPoint Presentation (Given by Guest Expert David Smyth)

bullet

March 26th

bullet

SEC Suspends Trading in Three Companies Promoted Through Spam and Internet Videos

bullet

Optional and Not Required: In the Matter of the Application of Frank P. Quattrone (March 24th, 2006)

bullet

April 2nd 

bullet

No Current Events Assignment (Thanks for Your Support Last Week -- All is Fine -- Click Here)

bullet

April 9th

bullet

U.S. v. Stringer (9th Circuit, April 4, 2008) (Ninth Circuit vacated the Stringer decision regarding parallel proceedings.  In Stringer, the district court dismissed criminal indictments against Kenneth Stringer and two other defendants based upon its conclusion that the government had violated the defendants’ due process rights and engaged in deceitful conduct by simultaneously pursuing civil and criminal investigations of defendants’ alleged financial fraud.  The district court alternatively ruled that any evidence obtained through Commission subpoena must be suppressed in a criminal trial.  In vacating the district court opinion, the Ninth Circuit held: “There was no deceit; rather, at most, there was a government decision not to conduct the criminal investigation openly, a decision we hold the government was free to make.”  The appellate court found the Commission provided each defendant with a Form 1662, which clearly stated that any information produced in the Commission investigation could be used in a criminal proceeding.)

bullet

April 16th 

bullet

LR-20520

Complaint

Press Release

SEC v. One or More Unknown Traders in the Common Stock of Certain Issuers a/k/a AWE Trading, Inc. and Andrew Andersen,  (SEC alleges that one or more unknown traders conducted their entire online account intrusion scheme over the Internet and concealed their identities by, among other things, fraudulently opening brokerage accounts in the names of individuals who responded to a job advertisement on the Web site Craig’s List.)

bullet

SEC Project PAUSE

 

bullet

April 23rd 

bullet

Last Class

 

 

Home             Law course: Securities Law & the Internet            Law Course: Advanced Securities regulation             About             Disclaimer

Questions or Comments?  Email webmaster@johnreedstark.com

                             Ó John Reed Stark.  All Rights Reserved.  Reproduction of material from any of the pages of JohnReedStark.com is strictly prohibited.